Happy Hacker Digest March 7, 1997
===============================================================================
This is a moderated
list for discussions of *legal* hacking.
Moderator is Carolyn Meinel.
OR to the Hackers forum: http://www.infowar.com
Please don't send us anything you wouldn't
email to your friendly neighborhood narc, OK?
To subscribe
or unsubscribe, just
use the subscribe boxes on the menubars.
If you decide you
just want to use the forum and not get
these mailings, I promise my
feelings
won't get hurt if you unsubscribe from this list.
Happy hacking!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Any excuse will serve a tyrant" -- Aesop
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL 'O the Day: http://www.newsday.com/ap/rnmpfn15.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
===============================================================================
*** From the Desk of Carolyn Meinel
===============================================================================
We aren't getting so many posts lately at our Infowar
Hackers site
(http://www.infowar.com). But more people will read you
if you post
there than if you post to this list. We only have a little
over
2,000 readers on this email list, but Betty O'Hearn, who
manages
that site, Infowar's Hackers forum gets the lion's share
of the
traffic of some 50,000 hits per week. And remember, Infowar
is an
award winning site, with a hot link from the prestigious
New York
Times web site.
Besides, we are getting way too many excellent posts. The
trouble
is that many readers are complaining about getting 25
kb/day from
this list. Right now we are badly backlogged, too. Post
to Infowar
and we'll get your post up within 36 hours, whereas you
may wait
for 5 or 6 days on this list.
===============================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
o IRC Woes
o Down on Unix for Dummies
o Email Forging Answers
o Finding Dynamic IP Addresses
o Linux Q&A
o Tracking Down Bad Guys
o More on Cracking
o Identd Clarification
o Flames
===============================================================================
*** IRC Woes
===============================================================================
From: Warpy <root@null.net>
I'm noticing a disturbing trend starting to form on Infowar's
IRC
server. To start off with it was OK. We were a bunch
of
newbie-intermediate hackers who actually wanted to learn
how to
hack. There were no op and/or flame wars, and we all managed
to get
along pretty well.
However this is not how it is today. Increasingly, people
who have
heard of the channel either through friends or HH have
been leaping
on-line. Unfortunately their only idea of hacking
is IRC-war,
which is lame to the extreme. But who can blame them?
Their just
newbie's like we all were at some stage.
However I would just like to re-iterate that the #hackers
channel
on www.infowar.com is for the discussion of hacking in
all its
forms. And under most people definition, channel take-overs,
flooding, and pinging someone down with a war script you
didn't
design is NOT hacking.
As well as that you DON'T advertise warez in the channel
openly. If
you've got a site ask people individually whether they'd
like a
look rather than flooding the screen with "/me has a warez
site at
123.456.789.0".
I'm not trying to be a pain in the a**, although I'm sure
that's
what it's coming across as to some people. I'm trying
to get those
people out there to whom mIRC and war-scripts are gods
to
understand there is more to hacking than that. If you
really want
to trade warez. Setup a new channel, don't join #hackers
to trade
it. And to those IRC warriors out there, sure playing
with a war
script is fun. But there is more to hacking than just
that.
Warpy
===============================================================================
*** Down on Unix for Dummies
===============================================================================
From: Anna Chronica <mcck@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
> From: "NiNo" <NiNo@main.rgv.net>
>
> I am wondering if there is anyone
out there that puts out a
> *.txt, or book that is a definitive
guide to UNIX commands and
> all their flags without all the other
hooplah that comes with
> typing MAN. Just: The Command;
The Flags; An Example Of Each;
> How They Interact With Each other!
No more, no less....There
> has to be one SOMEWHERE. I have
*heard* the "Unix For
> Dummies" (Yeah, flame me!!) book was
somewhat decent.
Actually, don't get _Unix for Dummies_ if the above is
what you are
looking for. I won't knock the Dummies books because
I think some
of them can be quite useful for people, especially people
who are
really computer phobic or brand-spanking new at something,
but if
you even know how to use the MAN command you are almost
certainly
beyond this book being of much use to you. I've
never encountered
the sort of resource you are describing above. Most
Unix books
I've encountered (the real Unix books, not the "for Dummies"
type
books) are pretty useful and straightforward.
About all _Unix for Dummies_ says about flags is a really
basic
definition of them and that just because 1's and l's look
a lot
alike on your screen, they aren't interchangeable.
That's the
learning level you are looking at here. Again, good
for someone
that that wouldn't occur to, but not much use to anyone
who's
beyond that point. ;)
Anna Chronic
===============================================================================
*** Email Forging Answers
===============================================================================
From: Iggy Drogue <optimus@canit.se>
>From: Jay Clements <jayc@compusmart.ab.ca>
> Another thing I was wondering about...when
ever I send mail to
> myself using sendmail on port 25 of some
server...there is
> never any subject.. How do you specify a
subject?
Just insert the line "Subject: blablablah" before the body
of your
mail.
Moderator:
... and put it in just after the "data" command.
===============================================================================
*** Finding Dynamic IP Addresses
===============================================================================
From: THE ZOMBIE RITUAL<zombie@thepentagon.com>
I think I can answer this pretty easily.
The site that you are referring to are using Java. A good
example
is Silicon Toads page. You go to his page and right there
in front
of you is your OS what browser and how many times you've
been
there. This doesn't mean he knows this about you.
I think of this
as a Java mirror. All it does is show you what you already
see.
Many people think this is just the most amazing thing
but it isn't.
Anyone can do it and it isn't hacking.
If you want to see how they do it then go to the page you
want to
see, go to View at the top of your browser then go to
"View
Document Source", this will show you the HTML and Java
script used
to publish this page. These codes are read by Netscape,
or what
ever browser you use, to create .html documents containing
variable
font sizes and colors, etc...
There is no magic to it. Its an illusion at best.
As far as your friends IP is concerned you have me a little
confused.
I'll explain IP addressing very shortly. An IP is a set
of numbers
in groups of four. You are assigned these numbers when
you log on.
They are always the same except for the last three. These
three
numbers change every time you log on (I wont go into why).
Tracking
a person should be left to the ISP. You can usually have
this done
(only if its necessary) by e-mailing the date time and
IP number.
The ISP will review their logs to see who it was.
I hope this helped a little. It wasn't very descriptive,
so don't
take this as gospel.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: Iggy Drougge <optimus@canit.se>
>From: Andre Chaperon <and-e@iafrica.com>
> IP address, as is mine, is Dynamically assigned.
Basically, is
> there any way (by means of a program) that
I can fined his IP
> number by just knowing his e-mail address
(dxia@aol.com) or
> ISP. An easy but unpractical way would
be when he logs on,
> e-mails me his IP address. But using this
way I must know when
> he's on or he must know when I'm on. I want
to be able to scan
> or ping or something. If he is logged on
it will return his IP
> address, or if he hasn't logged on yet return
nothing.
Go to a Tucows mirror and look for "IP posters". Such programs
for
Windows post your IP address on a web page or whatever.
> I've heard and even seen that when someone,
such as myself for
> example, browsers a site like for example
www.microsoft.com,
> that site or server can tell what my IP
address is, name of my
> ISP, what type of machine or OS I am running
etc. Using this
> method can't I track who has visited my
site, then looking at
> that list, look for dxia@aol.com (my UK
friend) which will have
> his IP address, or does this only work with
servers (such as
> ISP's) connected directly to the Internet.
Any web server written in more than five minutes can see
that. It's
not that much to care about if you're just surfing the
web, since
it's just an IP address, not an email address. Any web
server can
sense the IP address, direct line to the net does not
add anything
but speed and a permanent connection.-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: "Aileron" <aileron@aileron.com>
> From: Andre Chaperon <and-e@iafrica.com>
> I have a friend in the UK who has recently
subscribed to AOL.
> His IP address, as is mine, is Dynamically
assigned.
> Basically, is there any way (by means
of a program) that I can
> fined his IP number by just knowing
his e-mail address
> (dxia@aol.com) or ISP.
Andre,
http://www.mirabella.com has some software called ICQ which
may be
able to help you. It keeps track of people you specify
who are
online and connected to their site. (Runs in the background).
You
may want to make sure it's compatible with AOL, though.
/-\ileron
-=-=-=-=-
ColeSlaw Creative Internet
aileron@akula.com
www.akula.com/~aileron/csci
===============================================================================
*** Linux Q&A
===============================================================================
From: "Robert B. Greer" <robin1@kersur.net>
Can anyone help me . I partitioned my HD and installed
Linux
leaving half for a Dos partition to reinstall Win95. The
first half
I left as a DOS partition. When I reinstalled Win I am
afraid it
took the whole drive back . There didn't seem to be a
place in
setup to designate where it should go. Setup said
there was an
operating system already there. Any help would be
appreciated.
Robin Greer
http://www.kersur.net/~robin1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: k1neTiK <samk5@idt.net>
In the feb 27 issue John Beal wrote:
> A. You can Backup your entire Drive that you intend
on installing
> Linux on and then Fdisk it and create 3 new separate
partitions.
> 1 for Win95 to reside in 1 for The Linux system itself
and
> finally 1 for the Linux Swap file <tip the swap file
size should
> be approx. twice the size of your physical Ram onboard>.
I am not sure there is really a point for creating the
Linux
Partitions with Dos's Fdisk.
What I did, is on my 850 meg drive, I partitioned it into
one 600
meg partition, which I of course made as the primary active
partition, and that was all I did with Dos's Fdisk.
So basically
what I had was an 850 meg drive, of which 600 meg was
accessible
through Win95.
I then formatted the drive, and rebooted using the BOOT
and ROOT
disks I had created.
I then ran Linux's Fdisk, and since I had 250 meg that
was not in
any partition on my Hard Disk, I made a Linux Native partition
and
a Swap Partition partition.
If I am not mistaken if you try to create the Linux Native
and Swap
Partition using Dos's Fdisk, you will just have to delete
them
again. If you exit at this point, and run Dos's
Fdisk, and check
the partitions on your Hard Disk, you should find that
it says one
primary partition, and two non-Dos partitions. Now
you just have
to install Linux.
|//////////k1neTiK////////////////////////////////////////|
|//E-mail: samk5@mail.idt.net////////////////////////////|
|//IRC: usually on
irc.stealth.net from around 5:30 p.m.//|
|///(under the handle
k1neTiK, duh!)//////////////////////|
===============================================================================
Tracking Down the Bad Guys
===============================================================================
X-Sender: jopee@mozcom.com
I wanted to know who did something. So here's what I did
with Win95
telnet.
>whois dgte@foobar.com
>No match for mailbox "DGTE@FOOBAR.COM".
>finger dgte@foobar.com
>[dgte.mozcom.com]
>
>Welcome to Linux version 2.0.0 at foobar.com !
>
> 1:51pm up 1 day, 6:00, 1 user,
load average: 0.08, 0.03, 0.02
>
>Login: Dgte
Name:Joe Schmoe
>Directory: /home/Dgte
Shell: /bin/bash
>Last login Tue Dec 3 12:33 (PDT) on ttyp1 from
*****
>No mail.
>No Plan.
>
Are there other ways to find info about dgte@foobar.com?
Moderator:
I anonymized the domain name and some user info to protect
the
privacy of jopee. One thing I would suggest is to do "whois
foobar.com." This will probably give you the technical
contact for
Joe Schmoe's ISP. Then if this "Joe Schmoe" has been causing
you
serious trouble, email the technical contact and describe
your
problem.
If the whois command doesn't give you the technical contact,
there
are other options. See the GTMHH Vol.3 No.2 for a bunch
more
commands that will tell you more, most significantly nslookup.
Or,
if you have a Unix shell account, give the command "man
nslookup"
for details of the commands you can run from this invaluable
program.
===============================================================================
More on Cracking
===============================================================================
Sender: jericho@dimensional.com
> I just saw a *.txt file that said that would
work. I want to
> know for sure. You don't have to TELL
ME EXACTLY, just point
> me in the direction of some *.txt's for
me to read I have done
> SO many fr****** searches for "Rlogin" stuff
and cant find it!
> Thanks Carolyn.
So many? Try 'man rlogin' at the prompt big guy.
>Moderator:
>
> Alas, the NeXt operating system is a hackers'
paradise because
> it has so many hackable holes...
Unless you know something I don't, SunOS and Linux have
just over
10x the amount of holes in them as NeXT
Moderator:
But the NeXt holes are old and unpatched, so oftentimes
serious
crackers have all the tools they need to crack them already
on
hand.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Anonymous:
My question arises from the fact that in this day in age
of Caller
ID on every phone or modem that matters, how do crackers
get into
systems? I mean eventually any dialup no matter how routed
can be
traced back to a base number somewhere and other than
cell clones I
can't conceive other untraceable methods. Wouldn't detection
be as
easy as asking telephone companies to show their logs
or something?
And isn't cell cloning expensive? It's been a question
I've been
asking myself ever since I read The Fugitive Game, shouldn't
it be
easy to catch crackers by now? On a side note who is GALF?
(I'm new
to this list.)
Moderator:
GALF stands for Gray Areas Liberation Front. Gray Areas
is a
magazine edited and owned by Netta Gilboa. At last year's
def con
convention there a near-riot broke out when Netta used
her speech
to accuse a long list of hackers, many of whom were present,
of
being narcs. GALF then set out to punish her attackers,
but got
mixed up on who they were. I wasn't even there at the
time. Since
then the dc-stuff and Happy hacker email lists have
both been
prime GALF targets. The modus operandi is to break into
a computer,
send threatening and obscene messages to email addresses
found on
the system, and then erase the system files. Breaking
tactics
typically begin with sniffed passwords, followed by installing
a
program that allows telnet into a root shell.
===============================================================================
Identd Clarification
===============================================================================
From: k1neTiK <samk5@idt.net>
>Moderator:
>
> See Bronc Buster's excellent tutorials on
identd in back issues
> of the Digest. To summarize, if a computer
is running the
> identd (short for ident daemon -- a daemon
is a program that
> lurks around all the time on a port waiting
to do its job) it
> can tell your IP address. So to successfully
forge email you
> need to find a computer that is not running
identd.
repeat after me:
Ident has NOTHING to do with the computer knowing your
IP address!
ALL Ident does is make a query to port 113 of your computer
and if
you have Identd installed there it will ask Identd to
provide the
server with your Username. The easiest way to get
around this is
to install an Identd on your computer, and feed it a fake
Username
(you can use this to fake a fake Email). If you
have Win/Win95,
edit the Ident tab in mIRC setup and leave mIRC running
when you
send your fakemail. I posted a pretty long
description on how to
exploit this at Infowar in the "forging Email tips" section.
|////////////////////k1neTiK//////////////////////////////|
|//// http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arcade/4594 ///|
|//E-mail: samk5@mail.idt.net////////////////////////////|
|//IRC: usually on irc.stealth.net from around 5:30 p.m.//|
|///(under the handle k1neTiK, duh!)//////////////////////|
===============================================================================
*** Flames
===============================================================================
From: me38@juno.com (Certian Ly Notme)
>Moderator:
>
> I'm doing the meanest, nastiest thing of
all. I'm helping turn
> email bombers into laughingstocks.
Did you hear that RealAudio
> piece we had at the _PC World_ Web site.
Hit records showed it
> was one of their most popular interviews.
It got people
> laughing their ****** off at that johnny
xchaotic d00d.
>
> We'll see about GALF and your box. Just
gimme that notarized
> contract test your security. What, are you
afraid a 50-year-old
> newbie will rm your system philes?
>
First off, let me say thanks for not posting anything
that I've
written.
Second, you think that you are making everyone laugh at
johnny . .
. but look at what he's accomplished. There aren't
very many lists
that haven't changed their formats after his email bombings.
Yes, we'll ALL see about GALF. And I have no doubt
that you cannot
break into Damien's box. Have you broken into anyone's
box (and
not your own, that doesn't count: ooh, is there a double
meaning to
this????) ever? What the f*** do you want
a signed letter for?
He won't give you one. You know that.
You would lose face if you
accepted because you can't do it.
Find a new hobby CM. You're an idiot.
Moderator:
So then why doesn't jericho give me that notarized statement
so he
can prove to everyone that I'm an idiot?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: jericho@dimensional.com
> So if it is so simple, why hasn't he been
caught yet? Or u4ea?
> Or Angry Johnny? Or...
>
>Moderator:
>
> I'm keeping my mouth shut on Angry Johnny
because he's been a
> publicity gold mine for me. Look at the
mistake John Markoff
> made. Once Kevin Mitnick came to trial everyone
realized that
> super reporter Markoff was full of baloney.
So I need Angry
> Johnny to stay in hiding. Don't get caught,
please?
So you're going to cut him in on some of the profits, right?
Last I
checked, Netly News owed him 150 bucks for an article
he wrote. He
told them to hold the tab for now.
Moderator (aside):
(You know and I know that Angry Johnny email bombed me
as a free
public disservice that just happened to backfire
on him to my
advantage. But, hey, if you think email bombers
should be paid by
their targets, why not run an ad in Infoworld or
2600 offering to
email bomb anyone who will pay your for the 2 minutes
it takes to
carry out the attack?)
> As for GALF, that team used to strike everyone
who said
> anything bad about Netta Gilboa. I don't
agree that opposing
> Gilboa should
Not even close to everyone...
> be punished with wiping system files. In
my case, GALF goofed.
> Some jokester posted an alleged attack by
me on Gilboa to a
> hacker bulletin board, and GALF went on
the war path against
> me. You see the results -- now I attack
Gilboa at every
> opportunity. In fact, GALF has become such
a joke that lots of
> people are attacking Gilboa just to have
fun seeing what kind
> of attack GALF does next.
Don't believe everything you see is the only advice I can
offer
there.
> If any of you readers want the excitement
of dueling with GALF,
> the best place to go to incite attacks is
to post to the
> dc-stuff list (subscribe by emailing majordomo@dis.org
with
> message "subscribe dc-stuff.") Also, GALF
guys attend every def
> con convention taking notes on who says
bad things about Netta.
Completely out of curiosity here.. lets play hypothetical.
Lets say
I know most of GALF. Lets say they were NOT at the last
Defcon. How
would you reply?
Moderator:
I'd ask Rogue Agent and a few other guys how come they
saw GALF and
you didn't. Is it possible GALF is more than one person?
That's my
hypothesis.
===============================================================================
=M-o-d-e-r-a-t-o-r=============================================================
Carolyn Meinel
M/B Research -- The Technology Brokers
===============================================================================
To subscribe
or unsubscribe, just
use the subscribe boxes on the menubars.
If you decide you
just want to use the forum and not get
these mailings, I promise my
feelings
won't get hurt if you unsubscribe from this list.
=E-d-i-t-o-r===================================================================
Peter Beckman . beckman@purplecow.com
. http://www.purplecow.com/
===============================================================================